“Crimes and Misdemeanors” (1989) is
a Woody Allen movie with overlapping storylines. The weightiest concerns Judah,
a married man who has been having an affair with Dolores for two years. A crisis
arises when Dolores decides Judah’s wife should know the truth. He consults
Ben, a rabbi and old friend, who counsels him to confess to his wife and ask
her forgiveness. Judah doesn’t see this as an option. The situation heats up
when Dolores threatens to expose a shady financial dealing if he doesn’t do
what she wants. He confides in his brother Jack; Jack arranges for the murder
of Dolores. After the crime, Judah is wracked by guilt. Jack reminds him that
he will be brought down too if Judah turns himself in. Judah comes to an uneasy
peace with himself, saying that in real life people deny and form
rationalizations about egregious things they have done.
I told Paco about the movie, and he
said Judah’s intense feelings of guilt reminded him of Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment. Judah goes to the
scene of the crime to retrieve love letters; Raskolnikov keeps returning to the
scene of his crime. The difference arises in how the two stories end.
Raskolnikov can bear his inner torment no longer and turns himself in to the
authorities. In the movie, Judah meets Cliff (Woody Allen), who is a filmmaker.
He tells him his story as if it has happened to someone else, thinking it would
make a good movie. Cliff says that, to make the story a tragedy, Judah has to have
the guy turn himself in. This is when Judah says, “But that’s not what happens
in real life!”
Both Johnston and Marsh analyze “Crimes
and Misdemeanors,” Johnston focusing on the movie’s underlying atmosphere of
amorality and Marsh enthusing over its “portrayal of how complex moral
questions are part of everyday life.” I’d like to look at its treatment of
Judah’s conscience.
As a boy, Judah was taught by his
devoutly religious father that the eyes of God were always upon him and that
God would surely punish him if he committed an evil deed. Judah grows up and
abandons religion, but not before internalizing his father’s teachings. The
movie implies that these are the source of his guilt. While his crime is still
adultery, the rabbi advises him to make a mature response to his conscience; to
seek the joy and peace that come with a clear conscience. Judah gives lip service
to the idea but is more worried about the complex issues he is facing. Then the
murder happens—he is astounded at how horribly easy it is to solve the problem
of Dolores—and his conscience comes forward. There is a scene where he drives
through a tunnel and comes to the light at the end. Johnston says this
represents Judah’s deciding not to judge himself. Considering the later scene
with Cliff, I would interpret it as the moment when his insight about real life
arrives: things happen; we do things we regret; we keep moving; we don’t think
too much. By the time he meets Cliff, he has suppressed his conscience.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment